Legal Opinion

Gila Valley Electric, Gas & Water Co. v. Arizona Trust & Savings Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923No. Civil No. 2045PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.

Two questions are raised by this appeal: First, is the judgment erroneous? and, second, has the appellant sought an appropriate remedy?

The judgment was entered by default against Gila Valley Electric, Gas & "Water Company, a corporation, appellant. The original complaint, based upon two causes of action, prayed for judgment in the sum of $16,266.32. Judgment was rendered upon an amended complaint, not served upon the defendant, in the sum of $57,154.57, made up of many causes of action, including the two of the original complaint. The amendment consisted in adding new causes of action, not in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Daly v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Witter v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Darnell v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Welcher v. HoustonMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. MoseleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Corbet v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API