Gila Valley Electric, Gas & Water Co. v. Arizona Trust & Savings Bank
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLyman, J.
Two questions are raised by this appeal: First, is the judgment erroneous? and, second, has the appellant sought an appropriate remedy?
The judgment was entered by default against Gila Valley Electric, Gas & "Water Company, a corporation, appellant. The original complaint, based upon two causes of action, prayed for judgment in the sum of $16,266.32. Judgment was rendered upon an amended complaint, not served upon the defendant, in the sum of $57,154.57, made up of many causes of action, including the two of the original complaint. The amendment consisted in adding new causes of action, not in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Daly v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Witter v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Darnell v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Welcher v. HoustonMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. MoseleyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Corbet v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.