Legal Opinion

Corbet v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 6, 1990No. 1 CA-SA 89-261PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

This special action proceeding presents the question whether Rule 6(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, governs the time limitation provisions for a responsive pleading under Rule 55(a)(2). We hold that it does.

This case arises out of a contract action brought by plaintiff TURCO/K.A.S.I.E. (TURCO), against petitioner and other defendants. On May 19,1989, TURCO filed a complaint alleging that one defendant breached a lease agreement and that petitioner and the remaining defendants were liable as guarantors of the lease. TURCO sought damages in excess of $400,000.

Petitio…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Darnell v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Desmond v. J. W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kimball v. ShofstallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corp. v. OsterkampCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Ruiz v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Estate of Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Champlin Stopinski, Skipton and Assoc. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API