Ruffino v. Lokosky
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
McMURDIE, Judge:
*1110¶ 1 Russell Ruffino and Clients on Demand LLC (collectively, "Ruffino") appeal from a superior court order setting aside a default judgment against Melayna Lokosky. Because Ruffino had access to Lokosky's email address, phone number, and social media accounts, we hold under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 4.1(l )(1) that service by publication without first attempting to communicate with Lokosky by any of those channels did not constitute "reasonably diligent efforts" to obtain her address; therefore, publication was not the "best means practicable" to provide notice of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Preston v. DenkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Koven v. Saberdyne Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alpha Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Freedom Movers LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Amaya v. Southwest Auto Sales & Finance LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Amaya v. Southwest Auto Sales & Finance LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Einstein Associates LLC v. DAP Industries LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Emma Cuadros Ortiz v. Circle K Stores Incorporated, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.