Legal Opinion

Daly v. Blair

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1914No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Berrien; Bridgman, J. Case by John Daly against Frank Blair and others, as receivers of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company, for personal injuries. Judgment for defendants on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff was injured at the intersection of a highway crossing with the Pere Marquette Railroad in Berrien county, on March 12, 1912. On April 5, 1912, receivers for the railroad were appointed. Suit was commenced by declaration on February 26, 1913. The declaration named the receivers as defendants, but counted upon a cause of action against the railroad company. The return of service shows that the declaration was duly served on the station agent of the Pere Marquette Railroad Company at St. Joseph, in Berrien county. The receivers appeared by counsel and pleaded the general issue. Upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cattermole v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hernan v. American Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  3. Polhemus v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Pratt v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Miller v. Chapman ContractingMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nelson v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Wells v. the Detroit News, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fildew v. StockardMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Salem Springs, LLC v. Salem TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API