Legal Opinion
Ragsdale v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 2, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1256 (RBW)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Sandra Ragsdale, an employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), brings this action against the defendant Eric Holder, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, asserting claims of disparate treatment and harassment under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, codified at 29 U.S.C. § 794 (2006). Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) ¶¶ 1, 10-17. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges that because of her disability and in contrast to how “similarly situated non-disabled employees” have been…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Doak v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Richardson v. PetasisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Johnson v. PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Leiterman v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.