Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police Board
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 28, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-1028PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Diane M. Schmidt, filed her complaint on June 3, 2011, claiming that her employer, the United States Capitol Police Board (“USCPB”), 1 violated Sections 201, 202, and 207 of the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”), 2 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1438, 2 by engaging in a pattern of harassment, discrimination, intimidation, and retaliation against her on the basis of her sex and age, subjecting her to disparate treatment by denying her requests for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, and by taking adverse employment actions…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Gregorio v. HooverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Thomas v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.