Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Petasis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 7, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-0826PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Sharon D. Richardson, an African-American female, was an employee of Defendant The Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”) from April 2011 to January 2013. Ms. Richardson brings this civil action against JHU and four of its employees or former employees, Defendants George Pe-tasis, Shanna Hines, Deborah Grandval, 1 and Myron Kunka (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”), for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of…
2Cases cited97 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Ross v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hornsby v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Brokenborough v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- U.S. & State v. Coloplast Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.