Legal Opinion
Crofoot v. Crofoot
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1955No. Civ. 8561PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
Plaintiff commenced an action against defendant, alleging four causes of action. The first alleged extreme cruelty; the second, adultery; the third, fraud in procuring a property settlement agreement; and the fourth, that the sum of $39,922.05 was loaned by plaintiff to defendant. Plaintiff prayed for separate maintenance, for a decree setting aside the property settlement, and for judgment for the amount of money loaned.
In his answer defendant admitted that he and plaintiff were married on September 19, 1947, but alleged that this marriage was dissolved on November 2, 1950, by a decree of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Nolan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- De Vally v. Kendall De Vally Operalogue Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Meyer Koulish Co. v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- County of San Mateo v. BartoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Menchaca v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.