Legal Opinion

De Vally v. Kendall De Vally Operalogue Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 14333PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment entered upon order sustaining, without leave to amend, demurrer of defendants to the first and third causes of action stated in plaintiff’s amended complaint for declaratory relief, for an accounting, for salary, damages and other and further relief.

The complaint is predicated upon, and pleads in haec verba, a written agreement executed September 16, 1931, by plaintiff as first party, and by defendants Henry E. Kendall and his son, Gerald H. S. Kendall, as second parties. It was thereby agreed that these parties would form a California corporation (later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Nolan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Potvin v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. U. S. Financial v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API