Legal Opinion

DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1979No. Civ. 55853PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POTTER, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Jack A. DeGrandchamp appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Texaco, Inc., on plaintiffs first cause of action for declaratory relief. The complaint includes eight causes of action which, according to paragraph I of the first cause of action, all “grew out of the same set of facts, events, and circumstances,” and were joined “due to the fact that on the trial of each of said causes of action, common issues of law and fact will arise.... ”

Paragraphs I through XVI of the first cause of action describe circumstances giving rise to a controversy…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Miller v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API