Meyer Koulish Co. v. Cannon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Defendants Cannon-Schaefer Agency, a copartnership, and Fred J. Cannon, one of the partners, appeal from summary judgment rendered against them in favor of plaintiffs Meyer Koulish Co., Inc., and Arthur Nass, respectively.
Defendants were manufacturers’ agents. Plaintiffs separately shipped certain jewelry from New York to Los Angeles on consignment to defendant Cannon-Schaefer Agency and both defendants are charged with and admit receipt of the jewelry upon and pursuant to the terms and provisions of consignment memoranda sent them by plaintiffs. These memoranda place the risk of loss from…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- American Surety Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Reliance National Indemnity Co. v. General Star Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Transit Casualty Co. v. Spink Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.