Legal Opinion
Shea v. Leonis
California Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1939No. L. A. 17079PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A rehearing was ordered herein in order to give further consideration to the contentions of the defendants. A reexamination of the questions raised on the appeal has confirmed the conclusions reached in the former opinion. We therefore adopt as the opinion of this court on rehearing the opinion prepared by the late Justice Seawell and previously filed, as follows:
“This is an action to recover accrued rent in the sum of $16,833.33, with interest, and also taxes and assessments in the amount of $5,435, which the lessee agreed by the lease to pay. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Johnson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Carlesimo v. SchwebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.