Minifie v. Rowley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H.' Cabaniss, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Demurrers to the complaint in the present action were sustained without leave to amend and a judgment was rendered in favor of defendants, from which plaintiffs appeal.
In the complaint, which is under attack, it is alleged that on July 8, 1907, defendant Forrest S. Rowley whs indebted to the partnership of Jones & Givens in the sum of ten thousand dollars, the indebtedness being evidenced by two promissory notes of said defendant for the sum of five thousand dollars each, dated July 8, 1907. On January 3, 1910, Forrest S. Rowley, “for the purpose of renewing said notes of July 8, 1907, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.