Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1949No. L. A. 20783PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an action arising out of injuries suffered when a bottle of beer exploded.

The plaintiff operated a café in the city of Los Angeles. He was transferring a bottle of ABC beer, a product of the defendant, from its case to an icebox in his café when the bottle exploded in his hand, resulting in blindness in his right eye. The defendant was the bottler. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of the plaintiff the defendant appeals.

The first question to be determined is whether on the facts presented the plaintiff was entitled to an instruction on the *517doctrine of res ipsa loquitur; and if so…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API