Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of Sail Francisco denying a. motion to dissolve an attachment. E. P. Shortall, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. G. B. Benham, Edward Lande and Frank A. Duryea for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve an attachment.
The Stanford Hotel Company is the lessor in a certain lease upon which the Maryland Dairy Lunch Company, a California corporation and the original debtor, is obligated in the sum of $3,617.60, as unpaid rent, from March 1,1916, to October, 1916, the monthly rental of the demised premises being $452.25. The Lunch Company, prior to January 26, 1916, carried on an extensive restaurant business in San Francisco in four locations, one of which was the premises leased from the plaintiff at 250 Kearny Street. One M. Schwind-…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bart Arconti & Sons, Inc. v. Ames-Ennis, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Felipe Ruiz v. Blentech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.