Erkenbrecher v. Grant
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lewis R. Works, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShurtleff, J.
This appeal is from a judgment in defendant’s favor in an action brought against him to en force contribution as a co-guarantor with plaintiff and others of three certain promissory notes.
The defense urged in the answer and at the trial, and insisted upon here, is that the statute of limitations has barred the action.
The case was heard by the district court of appeal (first district, division one), and the judgment of the lower court affirm'ed. Thereafter the cause was transferred to this court, and the judgment again affirmed. The judgment here, and likewise the judgment of the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Shorb v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.