Legal Opinion
Yue v. City of Auburn
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1992No. C009412PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARLER, J.
This appeal is taken from an order and judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court after sustaining the general demurrer to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint for inverse condemnation without leave to amend. We shall reverse.
Facts and Procedural History
On May 23, 1986, Richard Yue, on behalf of RHRH, Inc. (doing business as the Shanghai Restaurant and Bar) filed a claim against the city of Auburn alleging that his restaurant and bar, located in the old city portion of Auburn, was damaged on February 18, 1986, by flooding and excessive water “caused by [a] poorly…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Catsouras v. Department of California Highway PatrolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sierra Palms Homeowners Ass'n v. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Constr. Auth., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Title Ins. Co. v. Comerica Bank-CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Stueve Bros. Farms v. Berger KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.