Legal Opinion
Sierra Palms Homeowners Ass'n v. Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Constr. Auth.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 29, 2018No. B275241PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerluss, P.J.
*1129Sierra Palms Homeowners Association sued Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority (Metro) and Foothill Transit Constructors for inverse condemnation and other torts arising from the construction and maintenance of part of the Metro Gold Line railway that runs adjacent to the condominium complex Sierra Palms manages. The trial court sustained Metro's and Foothill Transit's demurrers to Sierra Palms's inverse condemnation claim in the second amended complaint without leave to amend, finding Sierra Palms lacked standing to bring that claim. The court also granted Metro's and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- A.J. Fistes Corp. v. GDL Best Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- AIDS HealthCare Foundation v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Agindotan v. Wells Fargo & Co. CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Akhlaghpour v. OrantesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.