Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of Reclamation
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WANGER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court based on motions made by two sets of defendants named in Plaintiffs’ “Second Amended Complaint For Equitable and Monetary Relief,” filed on February 18, 1992. Westlands Water District (“Westlands”) seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Compliant pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). The “Federal Defendants,” consisting of the Bureau of Reclamation, the Department of the…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Schubert v. City of RyeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Firebaugh Canal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Westlands Water Dist. v. US Dept. of InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.