Legal Opinion

Hook v. City of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1931No. Docket No. 4408PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant City of Sacramento, a municipal corporation, from a judgment entered against it upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $5,000.

The plaintiff and respondent Zayda Hook brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her as the result of a fall, which occurred while she was walking from the sidewalk on the north side of “K” Street, in the City of Sacramento, down the incline or apron leading to the roadway of Sixth Street. The accident occurred about 12'-.30 P. M. on December 6, 1929.

The action is based upon the Act of 1923, subdivision 2…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Dawson v. Tulare Union High SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Granucci v. ClaasenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brown v. Holzwasser, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Brown v. Poway Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API