Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. City of Gustine

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1926No. Docket No. Sac. 3720PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The following opinion, prepared by Mr. Presiding Justice William M. Pinch of the District Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, while sitting as a justice pro tem., of this court, is adopted as the decision of the court:

The defendant is a city of the sixth class. At the times herein mentioned it had no city engineer, unless it can be said that the plaintiff was appointed to that office. The relation between the parties is shown by the minutes of the board of trustees of defendant and the contract entered into between the trustees and the plaintiff. In the minutes of July 12,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  3. Logan v. ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Skidmore v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Johnson v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lotts v. Board of Park CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Southlands Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Cotta v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API