Legal Opinion

Gorman v. County of Sacramento

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1928No. Docket No. 3466PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, County of Sacramento, from a judgment entered against it upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $10,000 and reduced to $7,500.

The plaintiff, Barton L. Gorman, brought this action to recover damages for the death of his minor son, George Andrew Gorman, charging that his son’s death was caused by the negligent manner in which the defendant, County of Sacramento, maintained a certain bridge across a canal or slough near the town of Ryde. It is the claim of plaintiff and respondent that the boy, while riding his bicycle along the public highway…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Varcoe v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Fleenor v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Norton v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API