Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Duntley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1949PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, C. J.

On this appeal the validity of an ordinance of the City of Portland, denouncing as unlawful bookmaking establishments, selling pools, and gambling upon animal races, is drawn in question as in conflict with state law. The action was commenced in the Municipal Court for the City of Portland by the filing of a complaint charging the defendant with violation of the ordinance by conducting a bookmaking establishment upon horse races. The defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint, which the court sustained, and the action was dismissed. The City appealed to the Circuit Court for Multnomah…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. PfitschSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Klamath Falls v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API