Legal Opinion
Reed v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1965No. Civ. 22337PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.
Respondent’s demurrer to appellant’s first complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment of dismissal was entered, followed by this appeal. The ground for dismissal was that appellant’s complaint did not state a cause of action.
Appellant sought damages for injuries allegedly received while he was an inmate at the San Francisco County Jail. His complaint alleged that another inmate, while performing services for respondent, negligently dropped a light bulb, which exploded and injured appellant.
Government Code section 844.6, subdivision (a) provides in relevant part that “. . . a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Post v. PratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Datil v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Towery v. State, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Sanders v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.