Legal Opinion

Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1934No. 296PublishedCited by 386 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The New York Milk Control Law of April 10, 1933,1 in authorizing the Milk Control Board to fix minimum prices for sales of fluid milk in bottles by milk dealers to stores in a city of more than one million inhabitants, established a differential of one cent a quart in favor of dealers not having a “ well advertised trade name.” 2 The Milk Control Board determined that the phrase “ well advertised trade name ” referred to four dealers, of which the complainant, Borden’s Farm Products Company, Inc., is one.3 The authority of the Board terminated on March 31, 1934. An amended act was passed to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by386 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

381 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API