Martinez v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The two federal questions that appellants ask us to decide are (1) whether the Fourteenth Amendment invalidates a California statute granting absolute immunity to public employees who make parole-release determinations, and (2) whether such officials are absolutely immune from liability in an action brought under the federal Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U. S. C. § 1983. We agree with the California Court of Appeal that the state statute is valid when applied to claims arising under state law, and we conclude that appellants have not alleged a claim for relief under federal law.
The case arises…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,287 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
1,282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.