Legal Opinion

Martinez v. California

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 3, 1980No. 78-1268PublishedCited by 1,287 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The two federal questions that appellants ask us to decide are (1) whether the Fourteenth Amendment invalidates a California statute granting absolute immunity to public employees who make parole-release determinations, and (2) whether such officials are absolutely immune from liability in an action brought under the federal Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U. S. C. § 1983. We agree with the California Court of Appeal that the state statute is valid when applied to claims arising under state law, and we conclude that appellants have not alleged a claim for relief under federal law.

The case arises…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,287 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

1,282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API