BORDEN’S FARM PRODUCTS CO., INC. v. TEN EYCK, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE & MARKETS OF NEW YORK, Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
*256Mr! Justice Roberts
delivered the opinion of the Court.
- This cause is here a second time. The prior appeal was from a decree denying a preliminary injunction and dismissing the bill.-1 We reversed, holding that evidence should be taken, findings and conclusions made, and a decree thereupon entered. After remand the appellant amended its bill, the court sent the case to a master who' made findings of fact, stated his conclusions of law, and *257recommended that an injunction be entered. The District Court accepted the master’s findings, and found certain additional facts, but dismissed the bill…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. Ten EyckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
3Cited by106 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.