Legal Opinion

Post v. Prati

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1979No. Civ. 53088PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

Plaintiff George P. Post sought injunctive and declaratory relief in an amended and supplemental complaint which challenged the constitutionality of Public Resources Code section 6922, enacted as part of the Geothermal Resources Act of 1967.

Named as defendants were Edward V. Prati, John T. Sink, Peter H. Flood, Richard J. Wall as trustee for children of Peter H. Flood; these defendants will sometimes be referred to herein as the surface owners. Also named defendants were Aminoil U.S.A., Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Mervyn Dymally, Kenneth Cory and Roy Bell,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. San Mateo County Coastal Landowners' Ass'n v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API