Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Gatling

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 12, 2002No. AC 22391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The pro se plaintiff Jesus Ruiz1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his petition for a writ of audita querela2 in which he sought to enjoin the judgment of eviction rendered against him in the underlying summary process action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly failed to hear his claim for a setoff against the amount of rent due *575the defendant, Keith Gatling.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

“[I]t is the established policy of the Connecticut courts to be solicitous of pro se litigants and when it does not interfere with the rights of other…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pizza Connection, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. CottoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Fuller v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Resurreccion v. Normandy Heights, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Orange Palladium, LLC v. ReadeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Alday v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API