Legal Opinion
Strobel v. Strobel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 2001No. AC 20269; AC 20276PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
These consolidated appeals are two more links in a seemingly endless chain of litigation between the parties that destructively centers on their only child.1 The defendant’s appeals concern numerous postdissolution judgments rendered by the trial court with respect to various motions filed by the parties and the attorney for the minor child.2 In her main and supplemental briefs, the defendant raises seventeen *616claims of error with respect to the judgments. We dismiss appeal AC 20276 and affirm the judgments in appeal AC 20269.
We glean the following facts from the record and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. PelletierSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oliphant v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In re Christina M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Mercer v. RodriquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.