Legal Opinion

State v. Cotto

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. AC 28296PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Elizer Tito Cotto, 1 appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis 2 or audita querela. 3 The defendant claims impropriety in the court’s holding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear his petition. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are relevant to the defendant’s appeal. On December 19, 1996, the defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135 (a) (1) and subsequently was sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment, execution suspended after two years, and…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Ruiz v. GatlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. State v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. WahabConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. McCarthy v. Chromium Process Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API