Legal Opinion
Rosato v. Rosato
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 14, 1999No. AC 14678PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The matter now before this court arises out of a decision we rendered on March 5, 1996. Rosato v. Rosato, 40 Conn. App. 533, 671 A.2d 838 (1996). The defendant has filed three pleadings captioned (1) motion to present new evidence for consideration, (2) motion to present additional evidence for comprehension of issue for reconsideration and (3) motion to sustain my reconsideration motion and comprehension of issue for reconsideration, respectively.1 Because this court does not take evidence, those portions of the motions requesting permission to present new evidence must be dismissed.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Summerville v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Schaffer v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. KluczinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Zanoni v. HudonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Markley v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. CottoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. WahabConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Rosato v. RosatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.