Legal Opinion

Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. Simon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 26, 1995No. 14580PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

In this summary process action, the defendant appeals from the postjudgment denial of his application for a writ of audita querela.1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his writ of audita querela because (1) the trial court clerk failed to inform him of the Appellate Court’s decision, and (2) the trial court improperly refused to hear the defendant’s equitable defenses arising out of potential damage to his mobile home if moved from the plaintiffs lot. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record discloses the following facts. On February 8, 1993, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Oakland Heights Mobile Park, Inc. v. SimonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Ames v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. GatlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. AlegrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. 2 Fraser Place Condominium Assn., Inc. v. MathisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Homeside Lending, Inc. v. Negron, No. Cv 99 0169795 S (Jan. 3, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  5. Montanaro v. Gorelick, No. Cv 97-0346208 S (Jan. 13, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API