Legal Opinion

Alday v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2005No. GDCA-T-04-501PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON APPEAL

2Per curiam

This action, seeking damages pursuant to MTO 2001-07 for personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiff as the result of slipping 1 on a strawberry on the floor of the Season’s Buffet, was tried to the Gaming Disputes Trial Court and resulted in a judgment for the Defendant. The Trial Court’s Memorandum of Decision, Wilson, J., found that the evidence produced at trial by the Defendant established that its employees had taken reasonable care to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition. The Trial Court’s discussion, however, went on to note that the Plaintiffs…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Allen v. NissleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Lupien v. LupienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Kirby v. ZlotnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Ruiz v. GatlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Crenshaw v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Kim Chai Mock v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API