In Re Marzec
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By writ of habeas corpus, Pete Marzee is seeking relief from conditions imposed upon him as a parolee from the State Prison at Folsom following his conviction of a felony. He asserts that the state'now has no authority either to imprison him further or to subject him to restraint by requiring compliance with certain conditions restricting his liberty.
The situation is a somewhat unusual one. Prior to 1940, Marzee twice had been convicted of a felony and was in this state after having escaped from the New Mexico State Penitentiary. In that year, by a judgment of the Superior Court of Los…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Barrett v. BartleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re WhittingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- In Re TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Matter of Application of StantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re McBrideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- In Re SchoengarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.