Legal Opinion
In Re Tenner
California Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1942No. Crim. 4406PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The question presented for decision by the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus concerns the constitutionality of the Uniform Act for Out-of-State Parolee Supervision (Stats. 1937, p. 469; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 5783.) He is held by the respondent Chief of Police pursuant to the direction of the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles of the State of Washington as a convict whose parole has been revoked.
It appears that after his conviction of a felony and sentence to serve five years in the Washington State Penitentiary, the petitioner was granted a parole, and, in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re MarzecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Pierce v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Niederer v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Gulley, Sheriff v. AppleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.