Legal Opinion

Matter of Application of Stanton

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1915No. Crim. No. 1870PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Warden of the State prison at San Quentin. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The petitioner was committed to the state prison at San Quentin on February 5, 1896, under a sentence of twenty-five years for murder of the second degree. Under the statute providing for credits to prisoners upon the time of their sentence, allowed for good behavior, the petitioner, if allowed the statutory credits, would have been entitled to his release on May 5,1911. The prison authorities are holding him in custody upon ttie claim that by reason of his misconduct he has forfeited his credits, and that such forfeiture has been declared by the., order of the board duly and regularly made.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Mayne KnowltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. DenneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re MarzecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API