Legal Opinion

People v. Hernandez

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1964No. Crim. 3513PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

At the time of his apprehension and conviction of heroin possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11500), defendant was a paroled state prisoner. On appeal from the judgment of conviction he contends that the heroin in his automobile was uncovered as the result of an unreasonable search and seizure by his parole officer, hence inadmissible in proof of guilt.

Defendant Hernandez was paroled from state prison in November 1962. Edward Boulton, a state parole agent, was his parole officer. In April 1963 a narcotics agent received information from an unidentified informer that Hernandez might have…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lanza v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Clifford v. Latta v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. State Of Iowa Vs. James Maximiliano OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. State of Iowa v. Justin Dean ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API