Legal Opinion

In Re Bandmann

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1958No. Crim 6305PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus by Charles Bandmann, Jr., an inmate of San Quentin, who, after a plea of guilty, of attempted abortion, was sentenced to state prison “for the term prescribed by law.” In response to such application we issued an order to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.

Petitioner was committed to prison on February 18, 1957, and has now served 18 months. Petitioner contends that his maximum sentence should have been one year in the county jail.

The substantive offense of abortion “is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. MoroneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re MarzecCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ingram v. Justice CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API