Legal Opinion

Koss v. Koss

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1999No. S-8065PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1996 John Koss moved to enjoin the Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) from enforcing two judgments for unpaid child support that the superior court had entered against him more than ten years earlier. He argued that the ten-year statute of limitations set out in AS 09.10.040(a) barred CSED from collecting on these judgments. The superior court disagreed and denied Koss’s motion. We affirm, holding the statute inapplicable because CSED does not commence a new “action” when it enforces an outstanding judgment for unpaid support.

II. FACTS…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. University of Alaska v. TumeoAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hickel v. HalfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. DeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Magden v. Alaska USA Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Lawson v. LawsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API