Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. Brotherton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2006No. S-11852PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Parties to a divorce proceeding appear before this court for the third time to resolve a debt arising out of the marital property division first made in 1995. The superior court ordered Douglas Brotherton to pay to Tahni Brotherton a sum equal to one-half interest in the ‘Wasilla property” coupled with an interest rate of 10.5%. Douglas appeals on the grounds that Tahni did not obtain a writ of execution within five years and did not have “just and sufficient reasons” to justify her failure to do so. Douglas also appeals the 10.5% post-judgment interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alaska Brick Company v. McCoyAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Moody-Herrera v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Liberty National Insurance Company v. EberhartAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Alaska Hous. Fin. Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Stewart v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ivy v. Calais Company, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API