Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case arises from a failed subcontractor relationship on a project on the North Slope. Conam Alaska appeals the superior court’s dismissal of its professional negligence cause of action and the superior court’s formulation of a jury instruction on piercing the corporate veil. Bell Lavalin cross-appeals, seeking to overturn the jury’s verdict that Conam Alaska was excused from performing the contract and was entitled to damages.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
A. THE PARTIES
The various business entities that evolve out of the parent corporations and their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.