Legal Opinion

Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1992No. S-4022, S-4039PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case arises from a failed subcontractor relationship on a project on the North Slope. Conam Alaska appeals the superior court’s dismissal of its professional negligence cause of action and the superior court’s formulation of a jury instruction on piercing the corporate veil. Bell Lavalin cross-appeals, seeking to overturn the jury’s verdict that Conam Alaska was excused from performing the contract and was entitled to damages.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

A. THE PARTIES

The various business entities that evolve out of the parent corporations and their…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Whittier v. Whittier Fuel & Marine Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API