Legal Opinion

State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. Dean

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1995No. S-6106, S-6116PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and EASTAUGH, JJ.

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

In separate proceedings, the Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) moved to reduce to judgment significant child support arrearages owing against two noncustodial fathers, Donald Cross and Gary Dean. The superior court in each case denied CSED the right to recover support installments that accrued more than ten years before the date of the motion. Each court held that former AS 09.10.040, 1 the statute of limitations applicable to “an action upon a judgment,” bars the collection of past-due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. SchaibleAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Young v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Scheele v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Britton v. BrittonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Carter v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cline v. ClineAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ferguson v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. P.G.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Guttchen v. GabrielAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API