Legal Opinion

Magden v. Alaska USA Federal Credit Union

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2001No. S-9314PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Under Alaska Civil Rule 69(d)(1), a judgment creditor who fails to obtain a writ of execution within five years after entry of judgment must show "just and sufficient reasons" before execution may issue. In the present case, B. Juline Magden appeals a superior court order allowing Alaska USA Federal Credit Union (AUSA) to execute on a judgment that was entered against her more than five years previously; Magden argues that AUSA failed to show any fair and just reasons for its delay in seeking execution. We affirm, concluding that the record supports the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. DeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Miller v. McManusAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Koss v. KossAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cline v. ClineAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Achman Ex Rel. Kemp v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re the Adoption of Hannah L.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API