Magden v. Alaska USA Federal Credit Union
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Under Alaska Civil Rule 69(d)(1), a judgment creditor who fails to obtain a writ of execution within five years after entry of judgment must show "just and sufficient reasons" before execution may issue. In the present case, B. Juline Magden appeals a superior court order allowing Alaska USA Federal Credit Union (AUSA) to execute on a judgment that was entered against her more than five years previously; Magden argues that AUSA failed to show any fair and just reasons for its delay in seeking execution. We affirm, concluding that the record supports the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neal & Co. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division Ex Rel. Inman v. DeanAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. McManusAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Koss v. KossAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brotherton v. BrothertonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Cline v. ClineAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Achman Ex Rel. Kemp v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re the Adoption of Hannah L.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.