Legal Opinion

University of Alaska v. Tumeo

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1997No. S-6898PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Two employees of the University of Alaska requested health insurance benefits for their domestic partners; the University denied their requests. The question on review 1 is whether that denial violates AS 18.80.220(a)(1), commonly referred to as the Alaska Human Rights Act, which bars discrimination in employment on the basis of marital status.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Mark Turneo and Kate Wattum are employees of the University of Alaska. Neither is married. The University provides employer-subsidized health insurance benefits for its employees and their…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Alco Parking Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sosa v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API