Lawson v. Lawson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Lee Lawson appeals a superior court order denying his request to modify his child support obligation. Lee challenges the constitutionality of Alaska Civil Rule 90.3 on the grounds that: (1) this court lacks the authority to create a child support rule; (2) Rule 90.3 is vague and overbroad; and (3) Rule 90.3’s financial disclosure requirements violate his rights to due process and privacy and his right against self-incrimination. We affirm the decision of the superior court and hold that Rule 90.3 is constitutional.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Lee Lawson and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Williams v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Wells v. BarileAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Huffman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- DeVilbiss v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.