Legal Opinion

State v. Harp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1984No. 10-79-08181; CA A24954; 10-79-08180; CA A25012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668NEWMAN, J.

The state appeals pretrial orders granting defendants’ consolidated motions to controvert the affidavit supporting a search warrant and to suppress evidence seized under it. ORS 138.060(3). In State v. Harp, 48 Or App 185, 616 P2d 564, rev den 290 Or 171 (1980), (Harp I), this court reversed an earlier suppression order. We considered the motion to suppress on the basis of the face of the affidavit because the trial court had not considered defendant’s motion to controvert. Now we also review the motion to controvert and the evidence thereunder and affirm the second order of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. McManusOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. AnspachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. StranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API