Legal Opinion
State v. Diaz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 23, 1977No. 76-1527-C-3, CA 7039PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.
Defendant was convicted of criminal activity in drugs, ORS 167.207, for the possession of hashish. The sole issue on appeal is whether the police had a right to seize the hashish. The police entered the residence where defendant was living to execute a search warrant authorizing them to search for the fruits of a residence burglary. While searching the residence the police seized a film canister which contained the hashish. Defendant asserts there was not sufficient information in the search warrant affidavit to support issuance of the warrant. Secondly, he contends, if the warrant was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. SherbineMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.