Legal Opinion
State v. McManus
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.
The defendant was indicted for Criminal Activity in Drugs (ORS 167.207). The defendant filed a motion to quash the search warrant and to suppress the evidence (marijuana) seized. It was stipulated that the *240court would hear the case without a jury and ■ try “the issues in the indictment and the issues, raised by the motion to quash and suppress at the. same time.”
The trial court denied defendant’s “Motion to Quash and to Suppress Evidence” and found the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment.
Defendant appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed by a divided court. State v. McManus, 12 Or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. GoodlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.