Legal Opinion

State v. Bruno

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. 10-82-06451; CA A27778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his property and residence pursuant to a search warrant. We affirm.

On May 26, 1982, Officer Tracewell flew a state airplane over rural coastal property 17 miles north of Florence. He observed several cleared areas in a secluded wooded canyon situated one-quarter mile east of Highway 101. The cleared areas were inaccessible by any means other than by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. AnspachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. DixsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. DixsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API